Chauvinist or chivalrous?

It was drizzling and my friend asked us (my sis and me) to go in rather than stand out and get drenched. We told him that there is not need to be so good and chauvinist (cause he was having an unopened umbrella and also standing out). He told this was the first rain of the season so it is better not to get wet in the rain. Why should we gals go in while he can stand, we also informed him this is first time we were out in rain (Yeah in 20 years of life (if u call it) this was the first time). He told we were talking like Tamil heroines. I wonder if that act was protective or sheer chauvinist attitude as if nothing will happen to guys but u gals must not take the risk of… Well! Was it Chauvinism or Chivalry? Very doubtful… hmmmmmmm….

I read somewhere, I think Indian Express some guest column. Where the author had written with equality, the word chivalrous men had died. And that she has wondered if her eternal quest for that man full of Chivalry and none of Chauvinism could ever attain success. Yeah…. It sounds tooooo far… I know…

I could have accepted it that it was chivalrous in he had handed umbrella to us. Right?

And no comments are allowed from that friend (better be off ….)…

Published in: on June 22, 2007 at 5:25 pm  Comments (1)  
Tags: , ,

News Made Sexciting

I have no idea who is doing the ads for Deccan Chronicle in Chennai, but whoever he is, he clearly seems to (perversely) think that women’s bosom is a great place for advertising. “Institute releases ‘vital’ statistics”, “Boom or ‘bust’”, “Get ‘both sides’ of the story”. Such double-meaning slogans are printed on the T-shirt of the gal models (right at the bosom) …

It affects any woman who sees the ad. How insensitive of DC to issue such creepy, cheap ads? Can’t they give some respect that women deserve? Rather than using such double meaning words and sentences and half clad models, I think DC can go back to that “Chennai Padippathu Deccan Chronicle” ad, it was much decent and better. At least it didn’t hurt anybody.

Published in: on June 22, 2007 at 5:23 pm  Comments (1)  
Tags: , ,

Women and the cultural burden

Watching an old movie with someone pretty unknown can be fun. At least you get to know what they think. Fast-forward to the dance sequence where the heroine dances around tress in saris and the hero wears a shirt and trousers. And my sincere Christian friend commented that compared to all western and other Indian dresses the sari is the best. I asked him back “Why?” He told he didn’t exactly know the cause but even in college guys like it when gals come in saris, etc. I retorted back “Try wearing 6 yards of cloth then you will know. No guy these days wear dhoti (which is Tamil dress); then why must gals alone wear saris because guys like it!”

I too feel saris look good on Tamil gals, I am not writing this blog entry against saris. I am writing this because it is clear that women have been forced to carry culture. For the culture to survive it has got to maintain its women within the set dress code.

You can hardly notice any guy in dothi today. Only politicians and rural Indians wear it. Even in case of functions our women are paraded in saris with matching jewellery, only men conveniently come in coat and suit. Women don’t come in evening gowns or ballroom dresses. Remember that!

Why should women carry on culture, when men can easily forget it, and ape the western culture! It is not that I want women to also ape. When men want women to preserve culture, they must use the same yardstick for themselves also.

While the dress code in Anna University conveniently kicks out half saris, everybody keeps silent. Then all of a sudden how can people expect gals to wear saris, when they hardly have any experience with the half-sari. I still remember what a struggle I had to put to get one half sari.

The matter is that a girl must wear a dress in which she is comfortable. If she is comfortable in a sari, then its fine. Being a girl, I know how uncomfortable it was the first time I wore it. The cold breeze against the stomach, the overall feeling of being watched…The importance your already too thin belly gets. All of a sudden the eyes get fixed on the hip to see if the gal has tied the sari ‘low hip’ or not. As if it is enough to give us a character certificate. I have heard very loud comments that only prostitutes wear low-hip, so that we gals don’t attempt at wearing them.

Any effort to make sari fashionable is not welcomed. Even the recent sari with pocket got the accusation that it was aimed to make women tie the sari in what is called the ‘low hip’ fashion. If we need to wear low hip, we will need at least 15 pins to make it stand properly at its place, which will make it all the more uncomfortable. Those are possible only in ads and movies.

Next time you see a girl in sari be content that she is wearing sari, don’t bother whether it is tied low hip or not.
We may talk much against the purdah system, but we ourselves are not good when we force women into 6 yard dresses, and say that “sari is the most sexy dress” and so on. They are just hollow words that cover our hypocrisy.

Published in: on March 21, 2007 at 11:42 am  Comments (9)  
Tags: , ,

Sexism and Question Papers…

I was recently trying my hand at answering some logic papers, actually some entrance exam papers … Here are the sample questions…

51. Statements:
All politicians are intelligent.
Some women are politicians.

Conclusions:
I Some women are intelligent.
II All those intelligent are women.

Next…

53. Statements:
Lawyers marry only fair girls.
Shoba is very fair.

Conclusion:
I Shoba was married to a lawyer
II Shoba was not married to a lawyer.

Another

Statement:
All students are boys.
No boy is dull.

Conclusion:
I No student is dull.
II There are no girls in the class.

I (in general) think all this logic sucks prime time. Because people’s thinking style is very different, and at times we can’t think the particular way the examiner wants us to think or apply logic… We can apply different reasoning and arrive at a different conclusion that can also be right, but we may land up losing marks.

The above questions are enough crazy to drive any self-respecting women to think about the prejudice of the examiner. Such questions make you feel as if you are dumb. It makes you feel worthless. It lessens your confidence and indirectly affect your exam scores if you are a woman.

I really hope such sexism disappears from question papers.

PS to men: Please don’t give comments in support of such questions. It indirectly implies that you could get to where you are in life because you too had such dirty, sexist thinking that degraded women.

Published in: on March 16, 2007 at 5:37 pm  Comments (2)  
Tags: , ,

Educated guys and their concept of wife….

Well, it was late in the night around 1 O clock and I was a bit too free so I went to G-chat; there was my friend (supposed to have been best friends).
Here I give a bit of the transcript of the chat!

//Deleted the chat//

What can I say about this guy whom I thought was EDUCATED human being (studying in one of the very top institutes namely IIT); but turns out to be a nightmare. Killing off his wife and saying there was a gas cylinder explosion for the simple fact that she doesn’t know how to cook. As if it were a genetic protocol that every woman must cook.
If u don’t like her divorce her, but killing away a human being is the most inhuman thing I can imagine.
I have been looking around at the concept that educated men have about ‘wife’. I remember one guy Ph.D in mathematics, who worked in several foreign countries, saying that his wife must not be more than 10th pass, another M.Sc Chemistry fellow saying that his wife must get every rupee only from him, rather beg to him for money. Another BL fellow saying that his wife must not have ever gone to college because she will be used/polluted. Another friend of mine exited chat when we started talking about second hand wife. (I am sorry that I have to maintain the anonymity of these guys though I would love to publish their names). Their main cause is that educated women will argue more, be more independent etc, so they can’t manage.
Imagine Kusbhoo saying that these days educated men don’t expect their wife to be virgin. I wonder from which foreign land she is talking. If she had talked to some ‘educated men’ she might have learnt that they have the most screwed concept of what and how a wife should be!
Educated men seem to be Male Chauvinist Pigs compared to uneducated men, at least uneducated ones will have some respect that you are educated. Men don’t want women with individual minds, or independent thinking, let alone chastity.
You can point out that not all educated guys are this bad. I too accept but they are the minority. Educated men seem to make criminals, be it Tandoor Sharma, or man doing dowry harassment on the next street. Education is given so that it can broaden their horizon, but looks like it has only narrowed men’s minds. They are not able to understand that marriage is between two equals and not between a slave and a master!

PS:- This is my first attempt at writing in a blog; so go light on comments

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.